Short Communication |
Corresponding author: Vivien Cosandey ( vivien.cosandey@bluewin.ch ) Academic editor: Stève Breitenmoser
© 2023 Vivien Cosandey.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Cosandey V (2023) Parvapila lyncispinnae new genus and new species (Coleoptera, Melandryidae) from South Africa. Alpine Entomology 7: 269-273. https://doi.org/10.3897/alpento.7.108448
|
The first Orchesiini of South Africa, Parvapila lyncispinnae gen. nov. and sp. nov., is described. Specimens were collected at the foot of the Langeberg Range and of the Kogelberg, mountains of Western Cape. Individuals were collected by sifting soil litter in Afromontane forests, an endemic vegetation community of Afrotropical mountainous areas.
False darkling beetles, Orchesiini, taxonomy, Afrotropical realm, Afromontane region
Orchesiini are characterized by their saltatory posterior legs bearing metatarsal spurs longer than the metatibiae and having trilobate genitalia (
Unidentified specimens of Melandryidae originating from nature reserves situated at the foot of the Langeberg Range and of the Kogelberg, Western Cape, South Africa, were discovered to be an undescribed species of Orchesiini. As it cannot be accommodated in any Orchesiini genera, a new genus is also here established.
Fifty-two specimens were examined. They are housed in the museums listed below.
OKZC Ondřej Konvička collection, Zlín, Czech Republic
PBPC Petr Bulirsch collection, Praha, Czech Republic
TMSA Ditsong (= Transvaal) Museum, Pretoria, South Africa
The images were taken with a Leica DFC425 camera in conjunction with a Leica M205–C compound microscope, stacked with Zerene Stacker (version 1.04) and processed with GIMP (version 2.10.30.).
Parvapila lyncispinnae sp. nov., by present designation and monotypy.
Parvapila has a distinct scutellar shield unlike most of the Orchesiini: Eucinetomorphus, Lederia Reitter, 1880, Lederina Nikitsky & Belov, 1982, Lyperocharis Broun, 1914. It can be distinguished from the three Orchesiini genera with visible scutellar shield, Orchesia, Hylobia Broun, 1880, and Microscapha by the following combination of characters: scutellar shield small with rounded posterior margin (Fig.
The name of this genus refers to its small (“parva” lat.) and convex shape (“pila” lat.: ball).
Body oval, small, ca. 1.5–2.5 mm long. Body convex in lateral view; sides regularly curved in dorsal view. Pubescence on head directed anteriad, on dorsal surface of pronotum, elytra and abdomen directed posteriad.
Head embedded in pronotum and directed downward, hardly visible in dorsal view; delimited posteriorly by carina. Neck surface with strong microreticulation. Distance between dorsal margin of eyes two times eyes width. Antennae long, as long as ca. half of body length, antennomeres progressively widening apicad, without distinct antennal club; insertion point of antennae hidden by lateral margins of frons. Maxillary palpi with strongly transverse articles II and III, apical article cultriform.
Pronotum transverse, regularly convex in lateral view, without impressions; lateral margins with lateral bead in posterior half, anterior and posterior margins not edged; anterior angles broadly rounded, posterior angles orthogonal with rounded tip, pointing posteriad. Scutellum visible, with rounded posterior margin. Elytra elongate; humeral stria marked, forming small gutter with completely edged lateral border. Epipleura well marked on most of elytral length, evenly narrowed posteriad. Elytra fused. Hind wings not developed. Prosternal process triangular, wide. Mesoventral process thin and elongate, triangular. Metaventrite separated from metanepisterna by incomplete suture, evanescent posteriad. Metanepisterna ca. 3 times longer than wide. Metacoxae directed antero-laterally and narrowed.
Legs robust, with wide, short tibiae. Metatarsal spurs and metatarsomeres wide.
Male: Metaventrite with a medial depression.
Holotype
(housed in
Paratypes
(3):
For now, Parvapila lyncispinnae is the only known species of this genus. It can be easily distinguished from other Orchesiini by characters given in the diagnosis of Parvapila.
The specific epithet refers to the shape of the sternite IX of males, which bears two patches of setae, recalling the tufted ears of the Eurasian lynx.
Length: 1.48–2.51 mm; width: 0.78–1.28 mm; depth: 0.57–0.91.
Body (Figs
Head with strong setiferous punctation; surface covered by homogeneous transverse microreticulation. Clypeus with strong and rough punctation; surface lacking microreticulation. Antennae long, reaching posteriorly ca. middle of body; antennomeres progressively widening toward apex, not forming distinct club; length ratios of antennomeres: 22-16-13-8-11-12-10-11-14-13-29; antennomere I and XI ca. twice longer than wide, antennomeres II, III, V, VI, and VII slightly elongate, antennomeres IV, VIII, and X slightly transverse, antennomere IX as long as wide. Basal maxillary palpomere small, as long as wide; second article transverse; penultimate article transverse, three times wider than long; distal maxillary palpomere 1.2 times longer than wide, widest at base, with inner margin slightly concave, outer margin widely rounded.
Pronotum ca. 0.4 times as long as wide, widest at base; surface covered by fine punctation, two times denser anteriorly than at base; elytral surface covered by microreticulation formed of transverse to polyhedral meshes. Elytra 1.5 times longer than wide; homogeneously covered with small granules except for elytral base, and with dense confluent rough punctation; lacking microreticulation, shining; pubescence long and dense directed posteriad. Scutellar shield small, 0.07 mm wide, ca. twice longer than wide, with rounded posterior margin, surface smooth and shining, bearing a few hairs. Metaventrite shining, homogeneously covered by shallow microreticulation and fine punctation and pubescence. Length of both metatarsal spurs subequal, almost as long as metatarsomere I; first metatarsomere seven times longer than wide; length ratio of metatarsomeres: 38-12-9-11.
Abdomen bearing dense pubescence on ventral side; surface smooth, shining, finely punctured, without microreticulation.
Male: Metaventrite (Fig.
Sternite IX (Fig.
Female: Metaventrite (Fig.
The specimens of Parvapila lyncispinnae sp. nov. were collected by sifting floor litter in Afromontane forests (P. Hlaváč pers. comm.) and on the foot of big trees (P. Bulirsch pers. comm.) in a few localities of the Western Cape (Figs
The Afromontane region is an archipelago-like endemism centre distributed on reliefs of tropical Africa (
Parvapila lyncispinnae may be endemic to both South Africa and specifically to Afromontane forests. It is probable that more species of Parvapila and of other Orchesiini are still to be discovered in moist areas of Afrotropical regions, of which the knowledge concerning Melandryidae is extremely limited.
The apparent restricted distribution of Parvapila may indicate a Gondwanian origin. In this case, its closest relative may be Lyperocharis, from New Zealand and the Chilean subgenera of Lederia, Fuscatelia Nikitsky & Belov, 1982 and Macrolederia Nikitsky & Belov, 1982, all of them being apterous. However, the residual scutellar shield may suggest a more recent loss of the flight ability. Possibly, Parvapila is more closely related to Hylobia from New Zealand. The subdivision of Orchesiini into genera is based on the patterns of the metasternal sutures, the direction of the metacoxae, and the presence or absence of scutellum, and of wings. These characters do not necessarily reflect evolutionary relationships. Phylogenetic studies and taxonomic revisions are needed to better understand the relationships of the Orchesiini genera, and more generally, the systematics of Melandryidae. Synthetic works and identification tools are also needed.
I thank Giulio Cuccodoro for providing the photographic material, Peter Hlaváč and Petr Bulirsch for transmitting additional information on the sampling stations as well as Jiří Janák for the pictures of localities. I also acknowledge Ivan Löbl for his comments on an early version of the manuscript. Finally, I thank the Ondřej Konvička and Darren Pollock for their helpful advice on the manuscript.